![bitperfect not repeting songs bitperfect not repeting songs](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dqKeS.png)
ASIO is capable of keeping the locked rate, and playing back other sounds at the same time. WASAPI Exclusive is nice, but it locks out the mixer from other applications/games playing back audio. I also only believe in noise shaping and dithering only for 16-bit sources - that is if the DAC or codec measures better at a native 24-bit sample rate versus just playing back the original audio (I'm looking at you, Cirrus Logic.)
![bitperfect not repeting songs bitperfect not repeting songs](https://cdn.allthings.how/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/allthings.how-how-to-bypass-disable-shuffle-play-in-spotify-albums-and-playlists-image-7.png)
And while SSRC is pretty impressive, and can alter the noise floor of lower quality audio, I'd much rather listen to that lower quality audio as-is, so there is no chirping or audible crunchy sounding artifacts in rare circumstances. I don't even believe in equalizer DSP being in the source chain that should be done later, before your output just like compression. I personally prefer ASIO and rate locking, so everything is bit-perfect. If you like Crystallizer, you're mucking up the audio already so the impact of bit-matched audio is likely to be slim in your perceived playback. Sink ALL of your money into great headphones and find somewhere you can audition them at or buy from someplace like say Amazon with an excellent no bullshit return policy that will allow you to try different headphones until you find the best you can afford at that price point. My best advice to anyone that wants to improve upon what they hear, buy better headphones. I honestly feel sorry for people that spend thousands upon thousands on there dac's and amp's for something that a blind test can prove they won't be able to tell a difference with compared to cheaper solutions.
BITPERFECT NOT REPETING SONGS WINDOWS
I like thick and heavy bass but with extreme detail, I think detail to me is the most important feature next to proper non-overwhelming bass.īut the vast majority of bullshit in cables, specialized balanced amps and DAC's makes it even more unlikely you'll hear a difference between the windows mixer and a pure ASIO run to the DAC. The only difference I hear with 96/24 recordings versus 44/16 is very slightly more detail and 96/24 sounds a bit "louder" but in a blind test I could likely be prove to not even know the difference. Lower bit rate recordings (I'm talking 128k MP3) can also be easy to pick out from say FLAC. Some good points but headphones are the only part of the equation that truly differs in sound from one another. Being 100% sure is better than debating it. Since I haven't gone to the trouble of doing what I just described, by using WASAPI, I know the Windows audio stack is not altering my sound. If yes, DS is NOT transparent, and if no, then yes it is transparent.ĥ.) It's really about as simple as that AFAIK.īut honestly, I use WASAPI too. I agree with Impulse, and if you want to find out once and for all whether or not DirectSound alters your music just do this:Ĥ.) Subtract the DS recording from the WASAPI recording and see if you hear anything. Finally, there is nothing wrong with MP3 because odds are, if you use ABX comparator and compare FLAC to MP3 in an acceptable bitrate like V2 VBR or more, the quality will usually be identical in most cases (until you buy $1,000 headphones). CD be better than SACD because studies have shown that after 550 trials, the listeners could not differentiate between a 24/96 and a 16/44 recording, they were guessing with 49.8% accuracy.
![bitperfect not repeting songs bitperfect not repeting songs](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Hx3kuwB9GbQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
Compact Disc is better than vinyl because it is more prevalent, easier to play/digitize, has superior sound quality, and does not degrade every time you listen to it. What if you are deciding between using vinyl or Compact Disc, or deciding between CD and SACD, or deciding between MP3 and lossless, and one option is significantly more convenient than the other? Which one would you like more, to accept the truth and take the easier option, or take the more intense/difficult option because it "feels" better?ĮDIT let me explain why I chose that example. I agree, it's better to accept the truth for what it is and go from there, than try to do whatever makes you feel better.